• Home
  • The TOPA Fight
  • Golden Duplexes & ADUs
  • Protecting Our rights
  • Events
  • 2024 Election
  • More
    • Home
    • The TOPA Fight
    • Golden Duplexes & ADUs
    • Protecting Our rights
    • Events
    • 2024 Election
  • Home
  • The TOPA Fight
  • Golden Duplexes & ADUs
  • Protecting Our rights
  • Events
  • 2024 Election

PROTECTING OUR COMMUNITY

PROTECTING OUR COMMUNITYPROTECTING OUR COMMUNITYPROTECTING OUR COMMUNITY

From the constant attack on property owner rights.

From the constant attack on property owner rights.From the constant attack on property owner rights.From the constant attack on property owner rights.

talking points for City council ballot measure meeting

"Councilmember Lunaparra's proposed ballot measure failed to receive a majority vote at the Rent Board and failed to collect enough signatures from Berkeley citizens. This last minute proposal gives no time for community input or City Council's thoughtful consideration. I respectfully ask you to vote no to moving this ballot measure forward in 2024."

Save Golden Duplex & ADU Exemptions Talking Points

GolDen duplex & adu owners are not "corporate landlords"

Social housing activists want to eliminate private property ownership, including the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units. A ballot measure for the November 2024 is being proposed that would take away the rights of owners who live on-site with their tenant. 


Housing activists strongly believe that owner-occupied parcels are controlled by evil landlords who intend to steal money and occupancy rights from their tenants. But in order for small owners to rent out their available units, they want assurances that they have some protections if the relationship with the tenant does not work out!


Main talking points for City Council Special Meeting on August 5:

  • This proposal failed to get a majority vote by Rent Board commissioners and failed to get enough Berkeley voter signatures to put to ballot. 
  • Vote no on Councilmember Lunaparra's proposed ballot measure. This needs thoughtful consideration by Council. 
  • If the voters had really wanted this, they would have made sure it got to ballot through a citizens initiative.
  • The elimination of small owner protections encourages larger investor purchases and scares away future small owners who are willing to live on site with their tenant.
  • PRESERVE CURRENT HOUSING STOCK NOW!
  • Vote no on Councilmember Lunaparra's proposed ballot measure. 


IF THIS WOULD HARM YOU SPECIFICALLY, TELL YOUR PERSONAL STORY TO THE MAYOR & COUNCIL. These stories are important. 


Craft your story by answering some of these questions:

  • Do you offer a rent to your tenant that is less than market?
  • Do you and your tenant share common space?
  • What kind of a relationship do you have with your tenant?
  • Would you take your rental unit off the market if the city made it more difficult for you to terminate that tenancy?
  • Do you have a vacancy right now that you will not fill because of increase regulations?

WHY put for a ballot measure the voters haven't said they want?

In 2018, the voters spoke and that said increased regulation owner-occupied parcels are a hindrance to the creation of ADUs. Golden Duplex exemptions follow the same lines of owner-occupied ADU parcels – increased regulation inhibits an owner’s likelihood to choose to rent to a long-term tenant. 

Golden Duplex & Owner Occupied ADU Survey Results

Download PDF

Copyright © 2024 BERKELEY RENT REGULATIONS - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • The TOPA Fight
  • Save Our Rights
  • Eviction Moratorium